Let's talk Lindsey (sp?) CClancy .... oh wow.
Okay - so as you may have heard by now, she has had herjury released - the judge having declared a MISTRIAL.
Her lawyer, doing what all lawyers do, argued that the jude should have det th ONE JUROR aside and choden a NEW ONE from the alternates, thn redo the deliberations all over again.
Um, NO - that's not the purpose that they hav alternates, dude!!
Altrnates aren't there because you didn't get the result you wanted ... they aren't there to replace jurors who you don't like ... they aren't there to fill in for somone who feels a certain way. OMG - can you imagine the vcan of worms this would present to the court system??
Well, the judge said no, that he was going to declare a mistrial, and then called to jury into court ...
This is where her lowyeer lost his f'ng mind IMO .... he rocks in his chair a few times - then stands up and says he wants to appeal the judges decision NOT to replace the joror ....
WHAT??
So get thus straight - you are on a jury, you have gotten word that the you are wanted back in court, so you are gettingting into line - they all come in the same oor, so they have to line up - and suddenly you ar told to wait??
Oh Jesus!
So, herr lawyer wants to wait unil SATURDAY Tto get a verdict from the Appeals court, the judge didn't think they would do that - the lawyer daid they would .... I think the judge knows better, sir ... but - just to be "fair" the judge gives him ONE HOUR to get a stay, IF he can actually find anyone at the Appeals court.
You have to realize - that this is all happening at 11:330am their time ... well close to it ... so chances are - unless he has a clerk sitting at the office with a draft of the appeal right there, it's likely it won't get heard.
Well, It sounded like it was heard and DENIED ... I'm guessing they told him the same thing I said, that's not what the Alternates are for.
Duh.
But, either way - they will be re-trying the case in about a month or so, fepending on how the courts are booked - I know one of the Prosevuton lawyers said she was going to be out of town for about a week in Oct.
So w will see ...
But, not to be deterred - her lawyer, ass that he is, goes out to the microphone and wlays it all on the shoulders of the person who refused to be a lemming and just go with the crowd.
Holy Crap!!
Dude - first off. At this point NO ONE KNOWS how they would have voted ... all we know is that the juror wouldn't follow the ruling regarding "reasonable doubt" ... and that's it.
Maybe it was 11 jurors thought she was guilty ... and he just didn't feel it.
Maybe it was 11 jurors thought she was not guilty, and he didn't feel that either.
We. Don't. Know.
Yet.
I'm guessing, there's gonna be some books ... memoirs ... coming out, soon.
Holy Crud.
I have an opinion - because of the testimony - but I will not share that right now.

