THE DEVIL WENT DOWN TO GEORGIA ...

So, you all remember the Georgia case against Mr. Trump?
No ... its not done yet ... my understanding is that its temporarily on hold.

Well he FORMER Prosecutor Nathan Wade has gone on Good Morning America (ABC) and made a statement in which he says he regrets that the relationship became the bigger part of the case ... 
That his marriage was "technically" over, they just hadn't gone through the divorce yet ...
And that Workplace Romances are as American as Apple Pie!

EXCUSE ME?!?!?!

I want him to explain that one to his EX-WIFE, his PREACHER, AND his new GIRLFRIEND!

This means
(A) this likely was NOT the first one he had 
(B)he is NOT repentant for what he did   
(C)he's gonna DO IT AGAIN at some point

And you know that's gonna be true ...

But I will give the news people credit ...instead of focusing in on the MONEY MATER, they are doing a great job at saying its all about the sex ...

Sound familiar??

Rewind back to 1994 ... Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky ... this poor woman - she just can't get away from being mentioned whenever something comes up ...

It just amazes me ...

If its a Democrat/Liveral that's being looked at ... its about SEX
If its a Republican/Conservative being looked at ... Its about MONEY

Interesting fact:

The majority of the richest people in America are Democrat/Liberal

True fact

So back to this guy ...

He seemed completely oblivious to others in this crap-chamber he has dropped them into.

MY UNDERSTANDING ... and I could be wrong, but I listened pretty closely to what was happening in the courtroom ... was that he and his wife were "working on" their marriage at the time ...
They were still LIVING TOGETHER ...
And the divorce didn't occur until AFTER she found out about the "other woman" in his life ... aka his BOSS!

And - really - I have not heard if the IRS is doing any digging into their finances to see if the money passed back and forth was reported ... after all, income is income ... and the amount these 2 were passing was INCOME!

I'm also wondering where she got the money to pay him back from?
You see, she isn't a "private attorney" ... she works FOR the COUNTY where the trial is taking place ...
During the hearing, sub-hearing (?)< she admitted that the money was from clients which she had held out ...

So where are those clients coming from???

And if they were from BEFORE she got elected, why wasn't that money turned over to the Firm where she worked??
Since, technically, it is THEIR money, not hers.
This is why most lawyers turn down a case - they are part of a group of lawyers/firm ... and it would be a CONFLICT OF INTEREST for the firm/group to represent BOTH sides in a case ...
So a RETAINER (she made it sound like this was retainer monies) is paid to the FIRM and not to a lawyer ...
generally speaking, when a lawyer leaves a firm - the retainer stays THERE ... it doesn't travel with the lawyer ... as far as I know ... I am probably wrong though.

But ... No ... the issue was NOT the affair ...
The issue was NOT the sex ...

The issue was about how they transferred MONEY between them ... 

All I can think of is:

WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE, IS SAUCE FOR THE GANDER